US BOMBS NUCLEAR FACILITIES IN IRAN: THE NEW CHERNOBYL?


By Nicolapps, Human Rights Defender


In an event that shook the entire world, President Donald Trump announced on his social media platform, TruthSocial, that the United States had carried out a "highly successful" military strike against "three key Iranian nuclear facilities": Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. The brief but devastating message unleashed a storm of speculation and fear: Are we facing a potential Chernobyl-like disaster?


☢️ What was attacked?


The three facilities are nerve centers of Iran's nuclear program:


* Fordow, located on a mountain and highly fortified, was used to enrich uranium.


* Natanz has been the target of previous sabotage due to its strategic importance.


* Isfahan contains a uranium conversion plant and nuclear laboratories.


Although these sites are not active nuclear reactors like Chernobyl in 1986, they do store dangerous radioactive materials that, after a bombing, "could release contaminating particles into the environment," affecting thousands of people.


🔥Can this be compared to Chernobyl?


Yes and no. Although there was no nuclear explosion like in Chernobyl, the destruction of nuclear facilities can lead to a significant release of toxic and radioactive materials.


This implies:


* Soil, water and air pollution in Iran and neighboring countries.


* Risk of cancer, malformations and respiratory diseases in the medium and long term.


* Impact on agricultural production and the regional ecosystem.


 🛑 And the geopolitical consequences?


This attack could be the spark that ignites a new regional conflict with global consequences:


* Iran could respond militarily, provoking an open war in the Middle East.


* Iran's allied powers, such as Russia or China, could intervene.


* International law norms are violated, destabilizing nuclear treaties and provoking a global diplomatic crisis.


Furthermore, the bombing of nuclear infrastructure without prior consultation with Congress or UN approval "constitutes a serious violation of international law," bordering on war crimes.


📉 A more unstable world


While some celebrate this offensive as a strategic strike, the people of the world must ask themselves: Is it worth risking human health, environmental balance, and world peace for unilateral decisions?


The memory of Chernobyl taught us that radiation is "not a game." But today, in the 21st century, it seems we have forgotten that lesson.


✊ At Nicolapps, we continue to denounce the militarization of the planet and defend life above any political or economic interest.

Comments